Saturday, August 20, 2016
Special Report from Sister Ciara on the Trial Of Hillary Clinton: The Case For Murder Grows
The Trial Of Hillary Clinton: The Case For Murder Grows
Special Report from Sister Ciara
On 19 May we wrote a report for you detailing how the Russian government had opened a war crimes file against Hillary Clinton and President Obama for their participation in the genocide occurring in Yemen—and that just earlier today the United States began to remove their military forces from participating in order to protect themselves.
However, what that report didn’t explain was that the reason Russia opened their war crimes file was due to the British lawyer who began this investigation against Hillary Clinton and President Obama for their criminal actions in Yemen having suddenly been killed a few weeks earlier.
Known as Britain’s top human rights lawyer who represented Julian Assange and worked alongside George Clooney’s wife Amal, John Jones QC was a barrister (lawyer/attorney) who worked on high-profile war crimes trials at The Hague—but who, at 5 am in the morning on 18 April, walked out of the heavily guarded and secure private psychiatric Nightingale Hospital, went to a nearby station platform, and then jumped in front of a train killing himself.
As to why barrister Jones, who everyone described as “brilliant”, was in hospital remains a mystery as on the day before his death he had spent the day with his family, but for reasons unknown become increasing concerned about his wellbeing and voluntarily checked himself into care—with some suspecting that he was suffering from the side effects of withdrawal from a medication he had been taking after he had previously been given a “working diagnosis” of bipolar disorder and anxiety by his psychiatrist.
Less than 24 hours after barrister Jones had placed himself in this hospital’s care, and without a very serious investigation as to why, he was allowed to leave at 5 am while wearing his nightclothes after he supposedly signed a release form—that just plain common sense says no hospital, especially a private psychiatric one, should ever allow any patient to do.
Most important, though, many believe barrister Jones “suiciding” makes him another victim of a long and ever growing list of suspicious deaths associated with the Clinton Crime Family co-leader Hillary—now popularly known as the Hillary Clinton Body Count.
And even more importantly, the United States, right now, has a legal doctrine to prosecute her for these suspicious deaths even though her fingerprints may never be found on a gun, or any evidence of any kind can be found directly against her!
Known as the “Doctrine of Chances”, this Western legal theory was first developed by the 18th-century French mathematician Abraham de Moivre as a probability theory that basically posits—“If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and flies like a duck, it’s a duck”.
The first use of the “Doctrine of Chances” against a criminal murderer defendant, for whom their was no actual evidence against, was the English serial killer George Joseph Smith, who, in 1915, was convicted of murdering 3 women—with the jurors actually just saying in their convicting him that no reasonable person could ever believe so many suspicious deaths associated with him could ever just happen by chance.
The latest use of the “Doctrine of Chances” to convict a murderer was in the United States this past week when Felix Vail was found guilty of killing his wife in 1962—and that the other suspicious deaths associated with him were allowed to be weighed by the jury who, like the English jury in 1915 against George Joseph Smith, found them to be beyond the realm of possibility.
Now I find it very interesting that the Washington Post in their writing about the use of the “Doctrine of Chances” to convict Felix Vail failed to inform their readers about it, choosing, instead, to just say: “The amount of time that has passed since the victim’s death isn’t the only thing that’s strange about the trial. Also unusual is the fact that the jury in Vail’s case will hear testimony concerning not just the death of Mary Horton Vail, for which he is charged, but of the other two women, for which he is not charged. The courts allowed this based partly on legal doctrine derived from a British murder case at the turn of the 20th century.”
To why the Washington Post failed to explain the “Doctrine of Chances” to their readers, I personally believe, is that they know it is applicable in all US Federal cases too, and was upheld as recently as 2001 by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces in the case United States, Appellee v. Bud W. Tyndale, Staff Sergeant where the Judge ruled:
“Like the majority of courts, this Court has accepted the doctrine of chances as a viable theory of logical relevance. Matthews, 53 MJ at 470. This doctrine posits that it is unlikely a defendant would be repeatedly, innocently involved in similar, suspicious circumstances. Id.; 2 Wigmore on Evidence § 242 at 45 (Chadbourne rev. 1979) ("The doctrine of chances and the experience of conduct tell us that accident and inadvertence are rare and casual; so that the recurrence of a similar act tends to persuade us that it is not to be explained as inadvertent or accidental.").
And, again, “If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and flies like a duck, it’s a duck”.
Now I began this letter to you citing a quote by the great Simon Wiesenthal who knew from his long, and dark, experiences in Nazi Germany, including in a concentration camp, that information is the only defense ordinary people have against the criminal regimes that rule over them.
Wiesenthal, also, reminded all of us that: “Survival is a privilege which entails obligations. I am forever asking myself what I can do for those who have not survived.”
So, let me ask all of you now—what do you believe your obligations are to those whom the Clinton Crime Family has murdered?
Like the German people of the 1920’s and 1930’s, too many in the West behave as if nothing is happening, while knowing full well that is, allowing these criminals to keep committing their crimes.
And history has long shown that when people act like this they one day wake up to find all of their freedoms gone, at best, and at worse find themselves at the wrong end of gun held by a man in a black uniform who is about to pull the trigger.
On the other side of this, though, is the human history that proves when enough people are fed up enough to actually defend themselves these criminals are brought to justice—after all, how fast and far would these criminals flee if 10 million people marched on Washington D.C., or London, or Berlin, or Paris tomorrow?
In order to defeat these criminals, however, and as, likewise, history has long proven, you need true information—which is what the Sisters of Sorcha Faal is singularly devoted to.
Your mainstream media, though, is run by the criminals for the criminals and has the singular objective to keep you as ignorant as possible so that you’re more easily manipulated.
They proclaim themselves to your very face to be “the guardians of truth”, but when they believe you’re not able to see them they laugh at how stupid you are for believing them and how smart they are in being able to deceive you—SEE IT FOR YOURSELVES!
And know this fact too—at the exact same time these criminals are lying and laughing at you, they’re doing everything they can to destroy us and those like us who keep telling you the truth.
The outrageous propaganda they use against us has become so extreme that there exists barely a handful of sites still operating who are telling you the truth—but even the few who are left are about to fail.
That includes us.
Simply stated—we can’t survive against these criminals unless you help us, TODAY!
If you feel you have no obligation to the truth, or to those who have died or been destroyed for trying to give it to you, I can only tell you that one day you’ll wake up in a world you never believed could exist.
Simon Wiesenthal, and millions of his fellow Europeans, once believed like that too—and that he regretted for the rest of his life and warned you too not to do the same.
So, and if you’re REALLY listening, help us now to keep helping you so that one day we can all watch The Trial of Hillary Clinton together and know, once and for all, and at least for our generation, we fought the good fight!
Have great peace with God,
Dublin, Ireland 20 August 2016