Search This Blog

Russia is not the Aggressor


The death of M.A.D. - When Nuclear Winter is no Deterrent - Schizophrenic US-Nato provocations in the Levant have made total war with Russia a near certainty


blogdog oct 6 2016 update - urgent anti war action required - Russia cannot save our civilization from destruction forced on free humanity by oppressive and deranged leadership: please see 

ISIS update 10/06/2016..Russia will take down any American airplane or rocket targeting Syrian army!


Russian Brass have patiently argued for decades that US Nato missile shield elements encroaching on Russian territory are seen as a direct threat to Russias nuclear deterrence.



These systems seem to make delusional American military planners believe that if a first strike nuclear attack were to be launched against the Russian federation by US-Nato forces that their extensive land and sea based antimissile batteries could pick off most of Russias retaliatory capability during the most critical launch faze, making an unthinkable war seem somehow tenable.



The fundamental balance of military power (Mutually Assured Destruction) has slowly lost its meaning in recent years and an unthinkable war against the federation seems near imminent, even in the face of the still unprecedented destructive capability of the Russian navy and air force.



Russian military planners have attempted to keep pace with this trend and have maintained and built up a strong deterrence platform, however, several red lines have been crossed with us ongoing efforts to take the Russian leased deep water port in Tartus, Syria, as well as the Russian naval port in Sevastopol that would service Russian nuclear submarines in a total war scenario assuring the deterrence of mutually assured destruction.



Us efforts to take these ports, deny Russian use of the airbase in Latakia, Syria, ongoing sanctions, warmongering rhetoric, and continued expansion of Us-Nato sheild elements and Nato forces in Russo-centric post soviet states have put American and Russian military planners into a total war trajectory, and as Putin has warned repeatedly over the red line in Syria, continued USA action (by proxy or otherwise) can only lead to a world war 3 scenario.

Russia's S-300, S-400 ready to hit any unidentified object in Syria - MoD warns US-led coalition







BREAKING WW3: Russia will take down any American airplane or rocket targeting Syrian army!








This video is clips from Valdai Forum 2015 - World between War and Peace and current discussions of the event. searchhttp://blogdogcicle.blogspot.ca/searc... That link youl find much more on this important conference, an absolute must see conference in entirety for anyone still trying to figure out whats going on. Part of the conference can also be viewed straight off youtube at this link-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFZRr...

(part of an old post pasted below (http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.ca/2013/...) for Context) 

(post also continues further below with important supporting articles as seen on global research dated Oct 5-6 2016)

Alexander Clackson: US interventions and NATO expansion:

While Russia has been adhering to international law and showing complete lack of aggression over the last 14 years, the US and NATO have been doing the opposite. US alone has intervened in the following countries: Sierra Leone, Nigeria, Yemen, Afghanistan, Philippines, Côte d’Ivoire, Iraq, Georgia, Haiti, Djibouti, Kenya, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Pakistan, Lebanon, Somalia, Libya, Uganda, Jordan, Chad, Mali, Turkey. NATO, meanwhile, has been involved in the Bosnia and Herzegovina intervention, Kosovo intervention, the Afghanistan War and most recently the Libyan intervention; with the latter two being complete disasters that have the left the countries in shambles and anarchy.


In addition, NATO has broken its promise to Russia. Mikhail Gorbachev reportedly agreed to allow German reunification within NATO after being promised that NATO would not expand “one inch to the east.” Instead, in 1999, Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic joined the organization, despite NATO claiming that it had no plans to expand after the end of the Cold War. Another expansion came with the accession of seven Central and Eastern European countries: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovenia, Slovakia, Bulgaria, and Romania. These nations were first invited to start talks of membership during the 2002 Prague summit, and joined NATO on 29 March 2004, shortly before the 2004 Istanbul summit. Most recently, Albania and Croatia joined on 1 April 2009, shortly before the 2009 Strasbourg–Kehl summit. Future expansion is currently a topic of debate in many countries. Cyprus and Macedonia are stalled from accession by, respectively, Turkey and Greece, pending the resolution of disputes between them. Other countries which have a stated goal of eventually joining include Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Georgia.

Russia’s worries justified
Putin rightly feels worried that NATO is on a mission to encircle Russia and the recent EU and US involvement in Ukraine only exacerbates those worries. Given the hostility that Russia faces on a daily basis from Western politicians and the media, is it really a surprise that Russia vehemently opposes any Western-backed government in Ukraine, especially following a dubious revolution, financed by the US?
Russia is used to receiving negative press ever since President Putin came to power in 2000 and made it his priority to protect the Russian national interest and not allow the West to go on an interventionist spree. But the latest attacks on Russia are not only incorrect and hypocritical, but also illustrate the desire of the Western powers to discredit and vilify Russia for its own geopolitical objectives. However, the events of the last decade clearly illustrate that it is the West that has been aggressive and interventionist, and it is NATO that has a plan to create an empire, not Russia.


Alexander Clackson is the founder of Global Political Insight, a political media and research organization. He has a Master’s degree in International Relations. Alexander works as a political consultant and frequently contributes to think-tank and media outlets

Follow this link for voluminous evidence detailing NATOS Genocidal March to Armageddon 
http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.ca/searc...



Video: US Considers Military Strikes on Syria Government Forces



By South Front


Global Research, October 06, 2016


South Front 5 October 2016


Region: Middle East & North Africa


Theme: Militarization and WMDUS NATO War Agenda


In-depth Report: SYRIA: NATO'S NEXT WAR?









Russian and Syrian warplanes have delivered massive air strikes on the joint terrorist forces in the province of Hama. Positions and manpower of the US-backed Ahrar al-Sham militant group, Jabhat Fatah al-Sham (formerly Al-Nusra Front) and Jund al-Aqsa (recently designated by the US as a terrorist group) near Kafr Zita, Tal Abyad and Al-Sathiyat were hit. Local sources say that air raids resulted in destruction of high number of military equipment and ammunition belonging to the terrorist forces.


The air raids also helped the government forces to repel the terrorists’ advance on Al-Sathiyat. Various sources report that the pro-government forces lost from 8 to 15 fighters in these clashes.


US military strikes against the Syrian government is at the top of the agenda today at the White House, when top national security officials in the Obama administration are set to discuss options for the coalition in Syria, The Washington Post daily reported. The US officials are going to push forward so-called “limited military strikes” in order to, according to the official version, prevent violations of the cease-fire by the Assad government and disrupt his ability to continue committing war crimes against civilians in Aleppo and, for sure, to push it back to the negotiating table.





The options under consideration reportedly include bombing Syrian air force runways using cruise missiles and other long-range weapons fired from coalition planes and ships. The report says the idea is supported by the CIA and the Joint Chiefs of Staff. One proposed way to do so without a UN Security Council resolution would be to carry out the strikes covertly and without public acknowledgment.


This approach also explains the coalition’s actions against the Syrian army outside Deir Ezzor in September when over 60 pro-government fighters were killed and over 100 injured in air strikes lately called an accident by US officials. Now, there are little doubts that it was likely an intended move to damage the government forces fighting with ISIS in the area.


The same threat forces Moscow to deploy an additional battery of the air defense system S-300 to the Russian Navy’s logistic facility in Tartus. The information was confirmed by Defense Ministry spokesman. Igor Konashenkov said the system will provide protection for the facility and Russian ships off Syria’s shores. Nonetheless, it’s clear that it will also strengthen the Russian air defense shield over the government-controlled areas of Syria.


The original source of this article is South Front


Copyright © South FrontSouth Front, 2016


The US Joint Chiefs of Staff Want to Join Aleppo Battle on the Jihadi Side, in Support of Al Qaeda



By Russia Insider


Global Research, October 06, 2016


Russia Insider 5 October 2016


Region: Middle East & North AfricaUSA


Theme: 9/11 & 'War on Terrorism'IntelligenceUS NATO War Agenda


In-depth Report: SYRIA: NATO'S NEXT WAR?









There won’t be a direct US military intervention against Assad under Obama. Obama turned back from plunging the US into what was clearly going to be an unpopular adventure after the false flag Ghouta chemical attack in 2013. He certainly isn’t going to roll the dice at the height of election season and with the Democratic candidate just barely edging out the Republican Trump.


Moreover, we’ve now learned that this time around even Secretary of State John Kerry – who was one of the main proponents of bombing in 2013 – is against it. The Washington Post:


This time around, Kerry has not favored using U.S. military force against the Assad regime, two administration officials said. He now prefers continued diplomacy with Russia, even in the face of what he says is Moscow’s willingness to “turn a blind eye” to, if not participate directly, in war crimes in Aleppo.


But just so you don’t think this means there are now fewer utter morons running around DC; since renewed brainstorming on Syria begun in the Obama administration last week the Joint Chiefs of Staff have joined the CIA in backing the US entering the Syrian civil war on the side of the Islamist rebels:


The CIA and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, represented in the Deputies Committee meeting by Vice Chairman Gen. Paul Selva, expressed support for such “kinetic” options, the official said. That marked an increase of support for striking Assad compared with the last time such options were considered.


Even these clowns understand this would be blatantly illegal, but not to worry, they have a solution for it:


The options under consideration, which remain classified, include bombing Syrian air force runways using cruise missiles and other long-range weapons fired from coalition planes and ships, an administration official who is part of the discussions told me.


One proposed way to get around the White House’s long-standing objection to striking the Assad regime without a U.N. Security Council resolution would be to carry out the strikes covertly and without public acknowledgment, the official said.


This proposal — raining down cruise missiles without taking responsibility for them — happens to be the exact same hare-brained scheme Kerry was banding about in 2013, and even he has since grown out of it.


Funny how the US on the one hand is talking up its bombs as a fitting instruments of its virtuous foreign policy but on the other hand would actually be reluctant to carry out this virtuous bombing out in the open. If the campaign is a virtuous one why the apparent shame?


And just so you know, the reason why Assad has to be bombed is counter-terrorism:


“There’s an increased mood in support of kinetic actions against the regime,” one senior administration official said.


“The CIA and the Joint Staff have said that the fall of Aleppo would undermine America’s counterterrorism goals in Syria.”


That’s right. Should the jihadis allied and intermingled with al-Qaeda be driven from Syria’s Aleppo city this will set back “America’s counterterrorism goals in Syria”. For America’s “counter-terrorism” goals in Syria to keep a strong foundation terrorist sympathizers have to remain in control of half of Syria’s largest city. Somebody has read their Orwell well.


The original source of this article is Russia Insider


Copyright © Russia InsiderRussia Insider, 2016


Beating the Drums for War with Russia. CIA, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Pentagon Convene at the White House



By Bill Van Auken


Global Research, October 06, 2016


World Socialist Web Site 6 October 2016


Region: Middle East & North AfricaRussia and FSUUSA


Theme: IntelligenceUS NATO War Agenda


In-depth Report: SYRIA: NATO'S NEXT WAR?









On September 30, the World Socialist Web Site warned: “It is evident… that the question of whether an escalation of the US intervention in Syria can wait until after the US election of November 8 has become the subject of heated debate within the US ruling establishment.”


It has taken barely a week for this assessment to find decisive confirmation. It has been fully established that the Obama administration is holding precisely such a debate.


On Wednesday, the so-called Principals Committee, consisting of the secretaries of defense and state, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the CIA director, as well as top presidential security aides, convened at the White House to consider proposals to attack Syrian government forces with cruise missiles as well as other acts of military aggression.


Both the CIA and the Joint Chiefs of Staff are reportedly in favor of such an escalation, which carries with it the real prospect of a direct armed confrontation between the US and Russia, the world’s two largest nuclear powers.


Reflecting the growing support within sections of the US establishment for a far wider war, key sections of the media, including the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post, have weighed in on the side of those within the military and intelligence apparatus advocating a new eruption of American militarism.


Among the most explicit examples is an opinion column by John McCain, the Republican chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, published in Wednesday’s Wall Street Journal. McCain indicts the Syrian government and its ally, Russia, for having “slaughtered countless civilians” through “relentless, indiscriminate bombing.” This is being written by an individual who was one of the most enthusiastic proponents of the “shock and awe” war in Iraq that cost over 1 million Iraqi lives.


The Republican senator writes: “The US and its coalition partners must issue an ultimatum to [Syrian President] Assad–stop flying or lose your aircraft–and be prepared to follow through. If Russia continues its indiscriminate bombing, we should make clear that we will take steps to hold its aircraft at greater risk.”


McCain also calls for the creation of “safe zones” for Syrian civilians protected by the US military and “more robust military assistance” to the so-called “rebels.” He acknowledges that this strategy “will undoubtedly entail greater costs,” but provides no specific indication as to the nature of these costs or who will pay them. McCain does not even hint at the catastrophic global implications of a military confrontation between Washington and Moscow.


Similarly, in an editorial Wednesday, the Washington Post asserts that Washington’s policy has failed in Syria because the US has “refused to use military pressure against the regime of Bashar al-Assad.” The newspaper complains that the Obama administration’s failure to carry out a more direct military intervention in Syria has resulted in “the shrinking of US influence, to Russia’s gain,” and approvingly cites CIA and Pentagon proposals for cruise missile attacks and the provision of more sophisticated weaponry to the “rebels.”


Finally, the New York Times published a front-page lead article Wednesday warning that Russia was using the period between now and the January 2017 inauguration of the next US president as a “window of opportunity” to “move aggressively” in providing military support for the Syrian government. The article favorably reports proposals for US air strikes and goes on to cite unnamed US officials as arguing that Washington could turn Syria into a “quagmire” for Russia, “particularly if the Arab states that support the rebels supply them with antiaircraft weapons and Islamic terrorists decide to retaliate by attacking Russian cities.”


This passage echoes an earlier warning from the top US State Department spokesman that the response of Islamist forces to Russia’s military actions in Syria could “include attacks against Russian interests, perhaps even Russian cities.”


The implications are unmistakable. Washington exerts overwhelming operational influence over the Islamist militias that have constituted the principal fighting force in the five-year-old, CIA-orchestrated war for regime change in Syria. Just as it directed them to attack the government in Damascus, it could order them to do the same in Moscow.


The article is supplemented by an opinion piece by Times foreign affairs columnist Thomas Friedman, who writes in his signature bully boy style, “Isn’t it time we give Putin a dose of his own medicine?”


While acknowledging that a military confrontation with Russia poses the direct threat of nuclear war, he declares, “But we also cannot just keep turning the other cheek” in regard to “Putin’s behavior in Syria and Ukraine.” He denounces Russia for “mercilessly bombing civilians in Aleppo” and twice charges Russian President Vladimir Putin with violating “basic civilized norms.”


Even from a columnist who has established the gold standard for cynicism and deceit, Friedman’s invocation of “basic civilized norms” leaves one somewhat slack-jawed.


There is not a single war of aggression launched by US imperialism for which he has failed to serve as a fanatical cheerleader. The same man who today laments the Russian bombing of east Aleppo in 1999 wrote in response to the US bombing of Serbia: “It should be lights out in Belgrade: every power grid, water pipe, bridge, road and war-related factory has to be targeted… [W]e will set your country back by pulverizing you.”


Less than four years later he played the same role in relation to Iraq, declaring before the 2003 invasion that he had no problem with “a war for oil,” and writing afterwards that the US had attacked Iraq “for one simple reason: because we could…”


Such are the civilized norms observed by the man from the Times .


Underlying the frenzied support for military escalation in Syria is the fact that the various terrorist organizations Washington has used as its proxy forces–including those directly affiliated to Al Qaeda–are on the verge of a complete debacle in Aleppo, threatening a strategic defeat in the five-and-a-half-year war to bring down Assad, an ally of Russia and Iran, and install a US puppet government in Damascus.


Such an outcome would represent a serious reversal for the policy pursued by US imperialism for the last quarter century, in the wake of the Moscow Stalinist bureaucracy’s dissolution of the Soviet Union. Washington saw this development as opening an unobstructed path to its pursuit of global hegemony. It adopted the policy of exploiting its military supremacy as a means of offsetting the decline in its global economic position.


The element of hysteria in response to Moscow’s actions in Syria stems from the fact that both Russia and China are beginning to frustrate this policy.


The media’s lurid claims of Russian aggression notwithstanding, there is no question that in Syria, as in Ukraine and the South China Sea, it is US imperialism that is the aggressor, provoking defensive reactions from both Russia and China. That, however, does not impart any progressive content to the policies being pursued by the Russian government. If Putin could get a deal with Washington that preserved the interests of both his government and those of US imperialism, he would sign it in a minute.


Unable to do so, and in the face of growing economic crisis and signs of social unrest at home, Putin has resorted to the promotion of Russian nationalism and an increasing reliance on the residual military power he inherited from the Soviet Union.


In the past few days, the Russian government has ordered the deployment of additional surface-to-air missile batteries to Syria and suspended an agreement with Washington for the destruction of weapons-grade plutonium. At the same time, pro-government Russian newspapers have warned of the threat a third world war and the government has launched a major civil defense exercise in preparation for just such an eventuality.


A policy of national defense by a regime that represents the interests of Russia’s capitalist oligarchy can only fuel the drive to world war. The masses of Russian working people confront the ultimate consequence of the Stalinist liquidation of the USSR in the form of a growing threat of nuclear holocaust.


.


The only force that can prevent a new world war is the international working class, organized independently and mobilized in a struggle against capitalism, the source of war. This requires the building of an international socialist leadership, and there is no time to lose.


We urge all of our readers to attend the November 5 emergency conference in Detroit, “Socialism vs. Capitalism & War,” as a critical step in this fight. Visit the conference web site and register today!


The original source of this article is World Socialist Web Site


Copyright © Bill Van AukenWorld Socialist Web Site, 2016


Official Washington’s New ‘Group Think’ for War with Syria-Russia


By Robert Parry


Global Research, October 06, 2016


Consortiumnews 5 October 2016


Region: Middle East & North AfricaRussia and FSUUSA


Theme: IntelligenceUS NATO War Agenda


In-depth Report: SYRIA: NATO'S NEXT WAR?









Not since the eve of the U.S. invasion of Iraq has Official Washington’s political/punditry class clamored more single-mindedly – and openly – for the U.S. government to commit a gross violation of international law, now urging a major military assault on the government of Syria while also escalating tensions with nuclear-armed Russia.


And, like the frenzied war fever of 2002-2003, today’s lawless consensus is operating on a mix of selective, dubious and false information – while excluding from the public debate voices that might dare challenge the prevailing “group think.” It’s as if nothing was learned from the previous disaster in Iraq.


For Americans who may find those two points hard to believe, they should remember that the United States and Saudi Arabia went in 50/50 with billions of dollars to finance the jihadist mujahedeen in Afghanistan in the 1980s, viewing these religious fanatics as a useful “tip of the spear” to kill Soviet troops who were defending the leftist secular regime then governing in Kabul.Most notably, there are two key facts about Syria that Americans are not being told: one, U.S. regional “allies” have been funding and arming radical jihadist groups, including Al Qaeda terrorists, there almost since the conflict began in 2011 and, two, the claim about “moderate” Syrian rebels is a fraud; the “moderates” have served essentially as a P.R. cut-out for the U.S. and its “allies” to supply Al Qaeda and its allies with sophisticated weapons while pretending not to.


That exercise in U.S.-Saudi realpolitik gave birth to the modern jihadist movement, bringing together a network of foreign jihadists, led by Saudi Arabia’s Osama bin Laden (which morphed into Al Qaeda), with Afghan/Pakistani extremists who evolved into the Taliban.


Though U.S. officials eventually came to fear this Frankenstein monster that they had helped create, Saudi intelligence continued to work with Al Qaeda and its affiliates, using them as a kind of international paramilitary force to punish Saudi enemies, particularly Shiite-dominated governments, from Iran to Syria to now Iraq.


The Saudis also began collaborating with Israel, which shared Riyadh’s view that Iran and the “Shiite crescent” represented a strategic threat. Between Saudi money and Israeli political clout, the two countries could fend off occasional fits of U.S. anger, even to the point of getting the U.S. government to hide a 29-page chapter about Saudi financing for the 9/11 hijackers from the congressional 9/11 report for a dozen years.


For the past five years, the principal target of this powerful coalition has been Syria, with President Obama occasionally joining in – as he did in authorizing “covert” CIA and Pentagon programs to arm “moderate” rebels – and occasionally bowing out – as he did in resisting pressure to bomb the Syrian military after a mysterious sarin gas attack outside Damascus on Aug. 21, 2013.


In summer 2014, when Al Qaeda’s spin-off, the Islamic State, began beheading Western hostages, Obama authorized bombing inside Syria but only against the Islamic State, which also had overrun large sections of Iraq and threatened the Shiite-dominated regime in Baghdad. (Obama’s bombing inside Syria was not authorized by the Syrian government so it was illegal under international law but Syria didn’t press the point as long as the U.S. coalition was attacking forces regarded as terrorists.)


New U.S. Hysteria


This more complex reality is completely missing in the new round of political/press hysteria in the United States. The neocons and their liberal-hawk sidekicks only talk about stopping the “barbarism” of the Syrian government and its Russian allies as they try to finally wipe out Al Qaeda’s jihadists and their “moderate” allies holed up in eastern Aleppo.





New York Times columnist Thomas L. Friedman.


This new “group think” has prevented Americans from looking at the Syrian situation with more nuance and objectivity. Indeed, if you mix in some of the other facts, the on-the-ground reality could be seen as the U.S. and its “allies” stoking the fire in Syria for five years and, now, as the Syrian military and Russian air power take drastic measures to finally get the blaze under some control, the U.S. government may bomb the firefighters and destroy their equipment.Many of these calls for a U.S. military intervention against the Syrian government (and the Russians) are coming from the same advocates for war who created the misguided consensus for invading Iraq in 2002-2003, voices such as Sen. John McCain, Washington Post editorial-page editor Fred Hiatt, and New York Times columnist Thomas L. Friedman. And, much like the Iraq example, these esteemed opinion-leaders pile up their propaganda arguments in a one-sided fashion designed to silence the few voices that dare raise doubts.


Beyond the illegality of that action, how the U.S. military intervention is supposed to fix things in Syria is never discussed. By strengthening Al Qaeda and its “moderate” front men, the prospects for a longer and bloodier conflict are increased, not decreased.


The long-held neocon dream of a Syrian “regime change” – even if it could be accomplished – would only open the gates of Damascus to a victory by Al Qaeda and/or its spinoff, the Islamic State. How that would make life better for the Syrian people is another never addressed question. There is simply the pretense that somehow, magically, the “moderate” rebels would prevail, though they are only an auxiliary to Al Qaeda’s Syrian franchise.


The “group think” also doesn’t permit in the inconvenient truth that the recent collapse of the U.S.-Russia limited cease-fire was driven by the fact that the “moderate” rebels are so intertwined with Al Qaeda’s Nusra Front – which recently underwent a cosmetic name change to the Levant (or Syria) Conquest Front – that the rebels can’t or won’t separate themselves.


The New York Times, The Washington Post and other mainstream news outlets have sought to bury this reality because it doesn’t fit the preferred narrative of the U.S. fulfilling its commitments under the partial cease-fire agreement and blaming its collapse entirely on the Russians and their dastardly behavior.


One outlier in this propaganda barrage, ironically, has been Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal, which published a serious article on this key topic on Sept. 29. It said, “Some of Syria’s largest rebel factions are doubling down on their alliance with an al Qaeda-linked group, despite a U.S. warning to split from the extremists or risk being targeted in airstrikes.


“The rebel gambit is complicating American counterterrorism efforts in the country at a time the U.S. is contemplating cooperation with Russia to fight extremist groups. It comes after a U.S.-Russia-brokered cease-fire collapsed last week and the Syrian regime and its Russian allies immediately unleashed a devastating offensive against rebel-held parts of Aleppo city that brought harsh international condemnation. …


“The two powers have been considering jointly targeting Islamic State and the Syria Conquest Front — formerly known as the al Qaeda-linked Nusra Front — a group that is deeply intermingled with armed opposition groups of all stripes across Syria’s battlefields. The U.S. has also threatened to attack any rebels providing front-line support to the group. …


“Some rebel groups already aligned with Syria Conquest Front responded by renewing their alliance. But others, such as Nour al-Din al-Zinki, a former Central Intelligence Agency-backed group and one of the largest factions in Aleppo, said in recent days that they were joining a broader alliance that is dominated by the Front. A second, smaller rebel group also joined that alliance, which is known as Jaish al-Fateh and includes another major Islamist rebel force, Ahrar al-Sham. …


“In a call with Mr. Kerry on Wednesday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Syrian rebels ‘refused to follow the U.S.-Russian agreement…but instead merged with [Nusra Front].’”


Misleading the American People


So, isn’t that point relevant to understanding what is occurring in eastern Aleppo, an area essentially under the control of Al Qaeda terrorists? As horrible as war is, there is more than a whiff of hypocrisy when politicians and pundits, who cheered the U.S. Marines’ destruction of Fallujah during the Iraq occupation and who support driving the Islamic State out of the Iraqi city of Mosul, wax indignantly in outrage when the Syrian military seeks to remove Al Qaeda terrorists from one of its own cities.





At the start of the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, President George W. Bush ordered the U.S. military to conduct a devastating aerial assault on Baghdad, known as “shock and awe.”


For instance, Washington Post editorial page editor Fred Hiatt, who repeatedly wrote as flat fact that Iraq was hiding WMDs, is still today the editorial page editor of The Washington Post, urging a new U.S. war on Syria. The Times’ Friedman, who was infamously wrong about the Iraq War and pretty much everything else, is still considered a premier American columnist who is courted to make high-profile public appearances.There is also the issue of why writers who helped mislead the American people and the world into the catastrophe of the Iraq War were never held accountable and are now in position to whip up more war fever over Syria, Ukraine and Russia. Far from being held accountable, the propagandists who justified the criminal invasion of Iraq have been rewarded with plum assignments and golden careers.


Now, Friedman wants to escalate tensions with nuclear-armed Russia, apparently with the sloppily thought-through mission of imposing another “regime change,” this time in Moscow. As unnerving as a nuclear showdown with Russia should be, Friedman starts his Wednesday column by fabricating a news item about a leak that supposedly revealed that Putin “owns $30 billion in property, hotels and factories across Russia and Europe, all disguised by front organizations and accounting charades.”


After going on for several paragraphs with his fake “news,” Friedman admits that “I made it up.” Ha-ha, so clever! Then, however, he cites what he claims is real news about Russia, including the dubious prosecutorial “report” blaming the Russians for the Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 shoot-down on July 17, 2014. That “report” – actually a series of videos – had serious evidentiary gapslogical problems and obvious bias, since it was driven largely by Ukraine’s notorious SBU intelligence service which the United Nations has accused of covering up torture.


But to Friedman, the allegations blaming Russia for the shoot-down were unassailable. He writes, “a Dutch-led investigation adduced irrefutable video evidence that Putin’s government not only trucked in the missile system used to shoot down a Malaysia Airlines plane flying over Ukraine in 2014, killing all 298 civilians onboard, but also returned it to Russia the same night and then engaged in an elaborate cover-up.”


It might be noted that some of that “irrefutable video evidence” came in the form of computer-generated images of an alleged Russian Buk missile battery traveling down darkened Ukrainian roads, very persuasive scenes, much like Secretary of State Colin Powell showing computer-generated images of Iraq’s “mobile chemical weapons labs” in 2003, labs that didn’t exist.


It also might be remembered that Iraq’s Saddam Hussein was also accused of mounting “an elaborate cover-up” of his WMD stockpiles, that also didn’t exist. The point being that slick presentations, which rely mostly on assertions and allude to untested evidence, aren’t always accurate. Skepticism is not only a sign of journalistic professionalism but is necessary to avoid horrible misjudgments, especially on questions of war and peace.


Blaming Russia for Everything


But Friedman just plunges ahead, also asserting that on Sept. 19, Russia bombed a U.N. relief convoy heading for Aleppo. In this case, Friedman cites U.S. intelligence officials who say that “almost certainly” Russia did it, although I had been told that some CIA analysts feared the attack was launched by Al Qaeda’s chief Syrian ally, Ahrar al-Sham, using a U.S.-made TOW missile. The United Nations also withdrew its initial assertion that the attack was an airstrike (although Friedman leaves that fact out, too).





President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney receive an Oval Office briefing from CIA Director George Tenet. Also present is Chief of Staff Andy Card (on right). (White House photo)


The problem with propagandists like Friedman is that they ignore the illegal actions of the United States, including mounting military attacks on countries without United Nations’ authority or without the justification of self-defense, in other words, outside the realm of international law. It’s also illegal to supply weapons to terrorists, as has been occurring in Syria both directly by Saudi Arabia and other U.S. “allies” and indirectly by U.S. covert operations giving arms to “moderates” who then turn them over to Al Qaeda.This is not to say that the Russians are innocent in these terrible incidents. Further evidence might convincingly prove that they are guilty – and, if they are, accountability should be assessed as appropriate. Horrible errors happen in war, such as the U.S. airstrike that killed some 62 Syrian soldiers in eastern Syria on Sept. 17 as they were fighting off an attack by Islamic State militants.


While putting on blinders regarding U.S. violations of international law and their human consequences, such as the Syrian refugee flow, the sanctimonious Friedman bizarrely blames Putin for this human suffering, too.


Friedman cites a scholar named Robert Litwak in claiming that “Putin’s departure from standard great-power competition — encouraging a flood of refugees and attacking the legitimacy of our political system — ‘is leading to shifts in global politics that could have revolutionary consequences, even if Putin is not motivated by revolutionary ideology.’”


Friedman’s solution to this highly questionable if not imaginary problem is to increase the pain on Putin and Russia, saying “it’s now clear that we have underestimated the pressure needed to produce effective engagement, and we’re going to have to step it up. This is not just about the politics of Syria and Ukraine anymore. It’s now also about America, Europe, basic civilized norms and the integrity of our democratic institutions.”


While it’s always tempting to dismiss Friedman as a nitwit, the sad reality is that he is an influential nitwit who helps shape “elite” American public opinion. He is now contributing to a new “group think” that is even more dangerous than the one he helped construct in 2002-2003 regarding the Iraq War.


Today, this new “group think,” which — like the Iraq one — is based on a false or selective reading of the facts, could lead to a nuclear war that could end life on the planet.


[For more on this topic, see Consortiumnews.com’s “Do We Really Want Nuclear War with Russia?” and “Obama Warned to Defuse Tensions with Russia.”]


Investigative reporter Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories for The Associated Press and Newsweek in the 1980s. You can buy his latest book, America’s Stolen Narrative, either in print here or as an e-book (from Amazon and barnesandnoble.com).

      


  • The above link is a voluminous compilation of evidence showing how we are heading towards an imposed war on Russia and her allies that will bring about the end of the world as we know it if unchecked. Arguably the most perilous of NWO agendas, averting this world war agenda must be the top priority for all those involved or resisting in any manner.




 (Partial Transcript) Even if the Electorate were to Show a Different Inclination, Secret Protocols Guarantee Alignment by any Means.

 Over a century of orchestrated wars and covert ops planned and executed by shadowy multi-generational fascists bent on world domination and genocidal depopulation have facilitated triggering an escalating world war scenario that will culminate in a nuclear exchange promising near total extermination of Homo Sapiens if unchecked.

 We are at the crossroads of quite possibly the greatest threat of Nuclear Armageddon since the Cuban missile crisis.

 The U.S. and its NATO allies have embarked on a military adventure, “a long war”, which threatens the future of humanity. Global Nuclear War is Unavoidable on Present Course.

 Wars, global wars, even nuclear wars, can seem to play out very slowly when viewed in present tense, however time for reform is drawing very short.

 Ending this journey to oblivion is of paramount importance and is the main goal of blogdog; having awakened to the Apocalypse Conspiracy, it is up to viewers to do whatever they can to stop this slow march to Hell on Earth.

 Imminent threats in proxy war fronts, Terror drills and false flag warning dates coming and going without incident, red lines being crossed and then redrawn; none of this is a reason to dismiss the cleptocracy's plans to carry out another 9/11 style mass casualty false flag terror attack, genocidally depopulate the planet with nuclear, biological and chemical weapons mass casualty attacks, and wage hellish global thermonuclear war.

 These threats will remain indefinitely until the treasonous actors are routed out of positions of power across the globe completely and permanently.

If you would like to see the original Apocalypse Conspiracy or Apocalypse Conspiracy 2013 - See original updated post - Blogdog special Video Presentations - http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.ca/2013/02/apocalypse-conspiracy-2013-illuminati.html

http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.com/search?q=crossroads&max-results=20&by-date=true







Russia has warned over the years that NATO anti missile encirclement is a direct threat to their deterrence capability and chips away at the balance of M.A.D. Russian military planners warn that antimissile batteries surrounding Russia could be used by NATO powers to diminish Russia's survivable nuclear retaliatory strike capability, in the event of a first strike scenario. The concern is from studying American and other NATO powers military doctrine that such a scenario is not only likely, it is an absolute certainty, Russia is the target of a war of civilizations pushed by NATO policy.

      Fearing a NATO first strike, Russia has worked to bolster its deterrence posture with more offensive and mobile nukes, fielding several new modern weapons systems, including the Baluga submarine based ICBM, and in the event of a NATO first strike, Russia's submarine fleets could possibly still deliver mutually assured destruction even in the face of unprecedented NATO antimissile systems.

       When one reads wikipedias description of MAD "The strategy is effectively a form of Nash equilibrium in which neither side, once armed, has any rational incentive either to initiate a conflict or to disarm (presuming neither side considers self-destruction an acceptable outcome)." and here in-lies the problem, MAD no longer applies, the NATO powers seem to think that they can win a nuclear war if they initiate it with enough antimissile systems to mitigate Russia's surviving retaliatory capacity, and they do not care how many NATO countries are destroyed in the aftermath, as long as they achieve their admitted goal of world government.

       Their goal (NATO Brass) is nothing short of the complete control and disarmament of the planet at any cost, and it does not seem to matter to them in the slightest if this sadistic totalitarian quest for world hegemony precipitates global thermonuclear Armageddon.



  
   

Russian Nuclear Posture Should Deter Foreign Military Operations 


     The balance of M.A.D. (mutually assured destruction) is more precarious than it was during the Cuban missile crisis days, with preemptive war doctrine on the table, doomsday seed vaults and D.U.M.B.'s (Deep Underground Military Bases), NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) encroachment in post Soviet Satellite States, and antimissile shield elements chipping away at Russian and Sino- nuclear deterrence. The global war on terror is an obvious facade to the not so secret agenda of world hegemony and domination by western and European elites.

     UK through NATO and American military surrogates make clear the war planning is ultimately global in nature and it is clear that Russia, China, and all countries not under the forced depopulation and debt slavery N.W.O. system will ultimately be targeted. The use of depleted uranium munitions proves the callous and inhumane nature of modern warfare without any regard for the future. Tactical nuclear weapons have now been reclassified as a variant of the conventional bunker buster bombs and are authorized for use in conventional war theaters by military commanders without any pre-authorization. Some of these so called low yield theater nuclear missiles have more explosive potential then the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, yet under current American military doctrine they are considered harmless and non nuclear in nature, and could be fired without any of the checks and balances associated with larger nuclear ICBM's (Intercontinental ballistic missiles).

     Another issue threatening to trigger global thermonuclear war is the USA's arsenals of refurbished ICBM's with non nuclear M.O.A.B. (Mother of all Bombs) payloads, many of which are known to be based at Diego Garcia, as part of Bush Jr's prompt global strike plan, to be able to hit any target on Earth within 45 minutes. The risk with this class of weaponry is that they are indistinguishable on Russian radars from actual nuclear ICBM'S and Russian brass has made formal announcements going back to 07 that any such missiles being fired will be assumed to be nuclear in nature and could elicit nuclear reprisals.


When the balance of M.A.D. dies, the world dies with it
           Highly recommended further reading is Michel Chossudovksy's Book - Towards a World War 3 Scenario - The Dangers of Nuclear War - PDF Link

Post continues with highly relevant recent article (March 11 2014) by Alexander Clackson as found on Global Research.ca - Russia or America: Who Is the Real Aggressor?

Russia or America: Who Is the Real Aggressor?

In-depth Report:
russianato
As the crisis in Ukraine continues to perpetuate, one aspect that has been particularly striking is the language used by the Western media and politicians to describe Russia and its President, Vladimir Putin.

The country and its leader have been branded as aggressors, invaders, empire builders and have even been compared to Nazi Germany. In the field of psychology, there is a term to describe a defence mechanism – projection, which is characterised by projecting unwanted feelings onto other people. Perhaps, the US and its Western allies are experiencing a surge of projection, as the way they have been describing Russia is not only incorrect, but is also an appropriate way to describe the Western powers.


Russia’s non-aggression
Let us start with Russia. Since President Vladimir Putin came to power in 2000, apart from the most recent crisis in Ukraine (which I will address shortly), Russia has been involved in just two major conflicts: The Chechen War between 1999 and 2009 and the so-called Five Day War with Georgia in 2008. In both of these events, it can be argued with some certainty that Russia did not instigate the conflict, and was in fact acting defensively. The Chechnya conflict began after the Invasion of Dagestan, when the Chechnya-based Islamic International Brigade (IIB), an Islamist militia [ covertly supported by the CIA], led by warlords Shamil Basayev and Ibn al-Khattab, invaded the neighbouring Russian republic of Dagestan on August 2, 1999, in support of the Shura of Dagestan separatist rebels. Russia was left with little choice but to enter Chechnya on 1 October. The campaign ended the de facto independence of Chechen Republic of Ichkeria and restored Russian federal control over the territory. It is even debatable to even consider this as a “foreign” conflict, as it is quite plausible to argue that this crisis was an internal one.


The conflict with Georgia follows a similar line of events as with Chechnya. During the night of 7 to 8 August 2008, Georgia launched a large-scale military offensive against South Ossetia, in an attempt to reclaim the territory. This move was completely unprovoked. The Georgian attack caused casualties among Russian peacekeepers, who resisted the assault along with Ossetian militia. Russia rightfully reacted by deploying units of the Russian 58th Army and Russian Airborne Troops into South Ossetia one day later, and launched airstrikes against Georgian forces in South Ossetia and military and logistical targets in Georgia proper. It is now well established that the majority of experts, monitors and ambassadors agreed that the war was started by Georgia.

Ukrainian Crisis
Since Putin became President, Russia has never attacked or invaded another country, unless there was a clear provocation from the opposite side. This fact seems to have gone unnoticed by the Western leaders and the media who continue to portray Russia as a scary and unpredictable country. Following the coverage of events in Ukraine, especially in Crimea, one would come to sense that the media is very keen to portray Russia as a nation that has repeatedly violated international law and sovereignty of other nations, when in fact, the opposite is true. Can the crisis in Crimea be called an “invasion”? Firstly, no blood has been spilled and there has been no fighting or even shots fired, except for warning shots into the air.

There is an argument to be made that Russia has violated the territorial sovereignty of Ukraine, however, it must be noted that both Crimea and Russia do not recognise the current interim Ukrainian government and thus to them, the territory of Ukraine is under completely anarchy and chaos. Due to the well documented incidents of neo-Nazi violence in Kiev and other parts of Ukraine, it has been the responsibility of Russia to ensure that ethnic Russians in Crimea are protected. Let us remember that Russia has not claimed that Crimea now belongs to the Russian Federation. It has simply placed its troops to preserve peace in the region. Depending on the outcome of the upcoming referendum on the status of Crimea on 16th March, Russia will no doubt take appropriate action, i.e. either leave if Crimea chooses to remain part of Ukraine, or stay if Crimean votes to become a part of Russia.


Blogdog note - Crimea is now in Russia -

Crimea is now back in Russia!!!! (Russian Majority)

http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.ca/search?q=crimea+is+russian#uds-search-results


US interventions and NATO expansion
While Russia has been adhering to international law and showing complete lack of aggression over the last 14 years, the US and NATO have been doing the opposite. US alone has intervened in the following countries: Sierra Leone, Nigeria, Yemen, Afghanistan, Philippines, Côte d’Ivoire, Iraq, Georgia, Haiti, Djibouti, Kenya, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Pakistan, Lebanon, Somalia, Libya, Uganda, Jordan, Chad, Mali, Turkey. NATO, meanwhile, has been involved in the Bosnia and Herzegovina intervention, Kosovo intervention, the Afghanistan War and most recently the Libyan intervention; with the latter two being complete disasters that have the left the countries in shambles and anarchy.


In addition, NATO has broken its promise to Russia. Mikhail Gorbachev reportedly agreed to allow German reunification within NATO after being promised that NATO would not expand “one inch to the east.” Instead, in 1999, Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic joined the organization, despite NATO claiming that it had no plans to expand after the end of the Cold War. Another expansion came with the accession of seven Central and Eastern European countries: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovenia, Slovakia, Bulgaria, and Romania. These nations were first invited to start talks of membership during the 2002 Prague summit, and joined NATO on 29 March 2004, shortly before the 2004 Istanbul summit. Most recently, Albania and Croatia joined on 1 April 2009, shortly before the 2009 Strasbourg–Kehl summit. Future expansion is currently a topic of debate in many countries. Cyprus and Macedonia are stalled from accession by, respectively, Turkey and Greece, pending the resolution of disputes between them. Other countries which have a stated goal of eventually joining include Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Georgia.

Russia’s worries justified
Putin rightly feels worried that NATO is on a mission to encircle Russia and the recent EU and US involvement in Ukraine only exacerbates those worries. Given the hostility that Russia faces on a daily basis from Western politicians and the media, is it really a surprise that Russia vehemently opposes any Western-backed government in Ukraine, especially following a dubious revolution, financed by the US?
Russia is used to receiving negative press ever since President Putin came to power in 2000 and made it his priority to protect the Russian national interest and not allow the West to go on an interventionist spree. But the latest attacks on Russia are not only incorrect and hypocritical, but also illustrate the desire of the Western powers to discredit and vilify Russia for its own geopolitical objectives. However, the events of the last decade clearly illustrate that it is the West that has been aggressive and interventionist, and it is NATO that has a plan to create an empire, not Russia.


Alexander Clackson is the founder of Global Political Insight, a political media and research organisation. He has a Master’s degree in International Relations. Alexander works as a political consultant and frequently contributes to think-tank and media outlets

http://www.globalresearch.ca/russia-or-america-who-is-the-real-aggressor/5372882

 Is a false flag imminent with Syrian chemical weapons? Will Russia declare war on NATO? Is hellish nuclear war inevitable? Trying to make sense of a senseless conflict.

(Stone) Many of us have watched in disbelief as Syria has been infiltrated and attacked mercilessly, we've watched the lies and disinformation spreading fear and hatred, and this notion that the USA and its European and NATO allies should be in good conscience supporting the foreign mercenary invasion and destruction of Syria.

While this has been going on we've seen Russian military planners patiently argue about NATO encirclement, and warning us that Syria and specifically the leased deep water port in Tartus was critical to there deterrence and the continued balance of mutually assured destruction. Russian military brass repeatedly warn that this path in Syria can only lead to world war.

What is at stake is more than witnessing yet another once proud and sovereign nation reduced to ruin, its populace murdered in the streets, and there land and resources pillaged, what we are witnessing in Syria could be no less then the beginning of nuclear Armageddon.

Beginning back in 2008 we have heard rumors of a CIA plot inside Syria to arm and fund would be terrorists protesting Assad's Syrian government. It is worth mentioning that Syria has and still desperately clings to a modern democratic system based on values of human rights and self determination, and Al-Assad was elected as President of Syria in 2000 and again in 2007, unopposed each time. (Again now in 2014 won by landslide in internationally monitored election)

Unable to gain much headway as far as funding political and protest movements in a colored revolution style takeover, NATO and USA warmongers have turned to this new Libyan styled terrorist proxy war of attrition, funneling arms and terrorists into Syria to weaken it, and to destroy the peoples faith in the government while spreading lies and fear.

The media campaign globally to paint Assad's Syria as the villain in this so called civil war has reached such a fever pitch that one may wonder if anyone on Earth even believes a word of it anymore.

Being a NATO member-state and bordering Syria, Turkey has always been instrumental in Washingtons war plans. As many of you already know, NATO article 5 simply put is collective defense, an attack on any NATO country is a declaration of war on all NATO member-states as a whole.

Article 5 of the Washington Treaty States:

The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of  the UN Charter, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area. Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security.
If it can be shown that Turkey was attacked by Syria, all NATO states will be treaty bound to come to its aid by whatever means necessary.

Now we know that just as with Iran, Syria would never initiate an act of war that would guarantee their absolute destruction, but we also know that it would be very easy to stage such an attack, Turkey could even be attacked by the very F.S.A. rebels  it harbors and trains at Washington's behest to wage the war of terror on Syria.

You may recall the false flag mortar attack on Turkish soil that nearly precipitated this broader war, this can be seen as a trial run and to set the stage for conflict on the Syrian Turkish border.

 Now we see patriot missile batteries and NATO troops in the border region, and more troops massed in Jordan, Israel, and on Naval armadas offshore.

A relentless campaign to convince the masses that a chemical attack by Syrian army on its own population or FSA "rebels" is imminent continues as the final pieces are placed on the board.

 In Davoes we are told by Debkafile that "comments by US President Barack Obama and Ambassador Dan Shapiro lack a US commitment to step in against the Syrian chemical threat. Obama is concerned with juggling his global military priorities against a shrinking defense budget.  The onus for coping with the chemical peril is being passed by Washington to Turkey, Jordan and Israel. US aid will be confined to setting targets, providing intelligence and coordinating Israeli-Turkish-Jordanian military operations if necessary to take control of the dangerous arsenal." This can be seen as just carefully worded bullshit by a Mossad front in cahoots with American warmongers. 

Washington has set the stage, they can pretend to be neutral all they want, they have caused all this mess and are just waiting to be called to Turkeys aid when the fireworks go off.

  However, there is a clear and present danger being ignored at the peril of every man women and child on Earth, the inevitability of a NATO war on Syria quickly spiraling into a nuclear war of unimaginable horror over the shattered balance of mutually assured destruction. 



 

Third Intifida - Is Iran falling into the Oligarchies trap to kick off WW3?

The Iranians must know they are falling for the ruling elites out of London (city of), Rome (city of), and Washington DC(city of) diabolical conspiracy to force on free humanity a clash of civilizations dubbed world war 3!

Israel is put there to cause these wars, we see it unfolding everyday our entire lives, the wars surrounding Israel. Is this the third intifada justice for Palestine demands? Israel is an occupying force right? However, Israel has nukes now!  Reading history helps, but never has it been more plain to see we (as Iranians, Syrians, Jordanians, Iraqis, Egyptians, Canadians, Americans, Russians, Chinese, DPRK, Taiwanese and all of humanity)  are being set up.

Events and news is scripted by  fascist eugenicists depopulating Earth and enslaving mankind; in a centuries old order of rule out of chaos. NATO central command and UN are pillars of this system but once they wage Armageddon as planned, they eliminate the security council of the UN, and presto chango, NEW WORLD ORDER, one totalitarian system, already busy depopulating Earth before even fully taking over, with UN secretary as dictator in chief of the world.

How fitting that right now the UN secretary general is a Chinese man! After-all, the puppetmasters have all but promised a  Chinese century and have been busy selling out. In terms of scripted "geopolitics", nothing is by chance, even if it appears that way to one man on the ground, or the punchline is 40 years out.

They've built this compartmentalized system that we are made slaves to, that we can never control, but cannot live without, and sucking at the tit of death, we march into wars designed by henchmen to precipitate meltdown, ruin, and ultimately nuclear winter.

 Slaves to the invisible "gods" of monetization, we march inexorably into oblivion by Nuclear Armageddon; as slaves and poisoned snapshots of humanity's true greatness and harmony with fellow man and nature. Lacking the basic human qualities of compassion, decency, honor, and reason, the ruling elite appear as vacuous shells of what we classify human beings.

We as a species are being manipulated to wage wars on each-other for our survival, and to right past and current injustices;  while an even more sinister and creeping death of planetary destruction in the form of an all encompassing slowkill agenda 21 eugenics program; poisoning air, land, and sea, and through GMO, poisoning our very dna, and by the nuclear and "defense" industries pollution; poisoning future proginies; and in essence exterminating all homo sapiens including to some extent even those in the elite sycophantic "class".

We can call it free humanity (Peace-loving majority) all we want, but the awful truth is that we are enslaved humanity, even those in every echelon of power, and we are being exterminated. Reverse the depopulation agenda or perish forever my fellow men and women of the world in which we believe we are free and safe, don't feel duty bound to fight enemies created for us, for this dark agenda is unfolding quickly and the endgame is nigh.

 Words of Lyndon Lerouche :
                 "We have to win this war against that evil empire"
  "What we face is the virtual extinction of mankind from the face of the Earth"
                       "If this game is not stopped, I can tell you that there will be no planet"

   




Obama's Israeli War Lies Speech
(Stone) You know Il be honest, the man has charm, I know about the NDAA, the kill lists for extra-judicial drone assassinations he signs off on, and the staged shootings, but I too want to believe these carefully crafted words, and it was an incredible speech,  I'l give him that, but heres where he lost me.

"Let me begin with security. I’m proud that the security relationship between the United States and Israel has never been stronger. (Cheers, applause.) Never. More exercises between our militaries. More exchanges among our political and military and intelligence officials than ever before. The largest program to date to help you retain your qualitative military edge. These are the facts; these aren’t my opinions. These are facts."

This part brought me down to the reality of the ever-present doom, and reminded me that this is not at all by chance, these events in history have been carefully shaped behind closed door meetings none of us are invited to, and where the interests of humanity as a whole fall well below those of a select few ruling dynasties.

"When I think about Israel’s security, I think about five Israelis who boarded a bus in Bulgaria, who were blown up because of where they came from, robbed of the ability to live and love and raise families. That’s why every country that values justice should call Hezbollah what it truly is, a terrorist organization -- (cheers, applause) -- because the world cannot tolerate an organization that murders innocent civilians, stockpiles rockets to shoot at cities and supports the massacre of men and women and children in Syria right now. (Applause.)

The fact that Hezbollah’s ally, the Assad regime, has -- has stockpiles of chemical weapons only heightens the urgency. We will continue to cooperate closely to guard against that danger. I’ve made it clear to Bashar al-Assad and all who follow his orders: We will not tolerate the use of chemical weapons against the Syrian people or the transfer of those weapons to terrorists. The world is watching. We will hold you accountable. (Cheers, applause.)

The Syrian people have the right to be freed from the grip of a dictator who would rather kill his own people than relinquish power.

 (Cheers, applause.) Assad must go so that Syria’s future can begin, because true stability in Syria depends upon establishing a government that is responsible to its people, one that protects all communities within its borders, while making peace with countries beyond them. These are the things I think about when I think about Israel’s security."


Heres where he really lost me though, now look, this is categorically false. I dont think that anyone really believes USA tired line of spreading democracy and supposed human rights by taking over sovereign countries by whatever means necessary, I hope thats not the case, but in case it is just get this straight. Syria is not a threat to any country, even the illegal occupying forces of Israel, for its outright theft of Palestine and usurpation of Syrian territory as well, and even Israel has and will be spared for the sake of humanity. Syrian intentions have been clear, they're forced into the same situation as Ghadafis military was, fighting off  mercenary jihadis while trying to make the world understand what is being done to them and the lies being told disgracing the heroism of their defenders. If anyone is going to attack with chemical weapons, the most likely scenario would be that the so called FSA, in an intentional act of terrorism, would carry out an attack to blame the Syrian Military Forces.

"When I consider Israel’s security, I also think about a people who have a living memory of the Holocaust, faced with the prospect of a nuclear-armed Iranian government that has called for Israel’s destruction. It’s no wonder Israelis view this as an existential threat. 

But this is not simply a challenge for Israel; it is a danger for the entire world, including the United States. (Cheers, applause.) A nuclear-armed Iran would raise the risk of nuclear terrorism. It would undermine the nonproliferation regime. It would spark an arms race in a volatile region. And it would embolden a government that has shown no respect for the rights of its own people or the responsibilities of nations.

And that’s why America has built a coalition to increase the cost to Iran of failing to meet their obligations. The Iranian government is now under more pressure than ever before, and that pressure is increasing. It is isolated. Its economy is in dire straits. It (sic) leadership is divided. And its position in the region and the world has only grown weaker. (Applause.)

I do believe that all of us have an interest in resolving this issue peacefully.

Strong and principled diplomacy -- (applause) -- strong and principled diplomacy is the best way to ensure that the Iranian government forsakes nuclear weapons. (Applause.) Peace is far more preferable to war, and the inevitable costs, the unintended consequences that would come with war means that we have to do everything we can to try to resolve this diplomatically. Because of the cooperation between our governments, we know that there remains time to pursue a diplomatic resolution. That’s what America will do, with clear eyes, working with a world that’s united and with the sense of urgency that’s required.

 But Iran must know this time is not unlimited, and I’ve made the position of the United States of America clear. Iran must not get a nuclear weapon. This is not a danger that can be contained -- (applause) -- and as president, I’ve said all options are on the table for achieving our objectives. America will do what we must to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran. (Cheers, applause.)"


  Its no accident that Israel has been allowed to acquire nuclear arsenals, and even survivable retaliatory capacity in the way of nuclear armed submarines. Its no mistake that Israel, a warmongering nation that makes no secret its intention of taking the entire world down with it in nuclear hell on earth in the event of its own destruction is permitted a nuclear program without any IAEA oversight. And it certainly isnt by happenstance either that Israel has been in concert with Washington and other western powers, been engaging in covert war and trade sanctions against Iran, which are obviously acts of war. Add to that the constant talk of attacking Iran preemptively, and we see clearly a situation where Iran, with Russia and China by proxy, being goaded into an attack, while the rest of the world has been programmed to accept as inevitable a future 3rd world war. DPRK too is unjustly targeted, and considering USA wargames and rhetoric, strong words from DPRK can be expected, as well as from Iran. 



"Here, in this small strip of land that has been the center of so much of the world’s history, so much triumph and so much tragedy, Israelis have built something that few could have imagined 65 years ago."



A few did imagine it, (ruthless ruling class criminal syndicate), and they scripted it as planned. Hitler was a pawn, just like so many others that have been used up and spit out dead. They got their Israeli Zionist homeland not for Jewish people or Gods will or any nonsense,  it was to foment future war, namely to set off a third World War to consolidate their leadership role over all nation-states, and to drastically reduce world population, and future population growth, with hellish scripted nuclear war.

Link for Obama's Israel Speech Full Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-e6gL3Mn1Q
Obama's full March 21 2013 Israel speech text: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/22/world/middleeast/transcript-of-obamas-speech-in-israel.html

 

http://syrianfreepress.wordpress.com/



 


 


http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.ca/search?q=russian 

Iran is not the Aggressor - http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.ca/p/httpwww.html
DPRK  is not the Aggressor - http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.ca/p/dprk-truth-page.html
Syria  is not the Aggressor - http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.ca/search?q=syria&max-results=20&by-date=true

To War! To War! - Never-mind Russian promise of Armageddon over Syria - Martin Dempsey’s Five Options for War with Syria - None of which involve cessation of hostilities -
http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.ca/2013/07/to-war-to-war-nevermind-russian-promise_25.html

 http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.ca/2013/09/chemical-attack-on-syria-who-did-it-and.html

 BLOGDOG SPECIAL VIDEO PRESENTATION Planned and executed by shadowy multi-generational fascists bent on world domination and genocidal depopulation, the wars surrounding Israel and Nuclear Armageddon are being scripted to cast in stone a totalitarian one world government for the western and European oligarchy, and elite bankster class. The film paints a very bleak picture of the state of world affairs with few glimmers of hope, however viable options are presented, and the brutal truth is revealed on such issues as Syria, Iran, Russia, China, DPRK, Missile Defense, Depleted Uranium Munitions, Israel and Palestine, past and current wars, Economic Slavery, and the march to Nuclear Winter. 

The balance of M.A.D. is more precarious than it was during the Cuban missile crisis, with preemptive nuclear war doctrine on the table, doomsday seed vaults and D.U.M.B.'s, NATO encroachment in post soviet satellite states, and antimissile shield elements chipping away at Russian and Sino- nuclear deterrence. The global war on terror is an obvious facade to the not so secret agenda of world hegemony and domination by western and European elites. UK through NATO and American military surrogates make clear the war planning is ultimately global in nature and it is clear that Russia, China, and all countries not fully under the forced depopulation and debt slavery N.W.O. system will ultimately be targeted. 

To clarify, this video does not predict apocalyptic wars, heinous 9/11 scale false flag terror attacks, civil war, genocidal ramping up of the depopulation agenda, or total collapse for 2013 specifically, (however probable); 2013 is in the title because that was the compilation date as well as most of the content revolves around war scenarios coalescing in 2013. The subject content is very relevant for the summer of 2013 and beyond, as we see the WW3 triggers being pulled with reckless abandon on the diplomatic, covert, and military provocation side of world affairs. According to Pentagon war planning the current war agendas are fore-casted out as far as 2025, and by then they plan on basically having conquered every nation on Earth, great or small, nuclear armed or not. (Killing in the name of peace of course) As many of you know, they are well on their way in that aim already, (one world government) with UN, NATO, USA, and other puppet powers war efforts, however the chances of total one world government coming to fruition without hellish nuclear war being triggered is about as bleak a prospect as a snowballs chance in Hell. Ending this march to oblivion is of paramount importance and is the main goal of the video; having awakened to the apocalypse conspiracy, it is up to viewers to do whatever they can to stop this slow march to Hell on Earth. 

Imminent threats in proxy war fronts, Terror drills and false flag warning dates coming and going without incident, red lines being crossed and then redrawn; none of this is a reason to dismiss the cleptocracy's plans to carry out another 9/11 style mass casualty false flag terror attack, genocidally depopulate the planet with bio and chemical weapons mass casualty attacks, and wage hellish global thermonuclear war. These threats will remain indefinitely until the treasonous actors are routed out of positions of power across the globe completely and permanently.

Re: comments about depopulation; its Gods will?; they've changed the bible and used it as a war script. Faith and believing in God is one thing but expecting him to save us or that evil is his will is ludicrous, whether you believe in God or not is irrelevant if you ask me, we all need to expose evil and fight it for our very survival. And overpopulation is a fallacy!

Nuclear War Closing In - http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.ca/2014/...
Russia is not the Aggressor - http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.ca/searc...
China is not the Aggressor - http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.ca/p/chi...
Iran is not the Aggressor - http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.ca/p/htt...
DPRK is not the Aggressor - http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.ca/p/dpr...
Syria is not the Aggressor - http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.ca/searc...
To War To War - WW3 - http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.ca/2013/...
LarouchPac - Unsurviveable - http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.ca/2013/...
The road to WW3 - http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.ca/2013/...
9/11 False Flag - http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.ca/2013/...
Walter Veith Full Lecture - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLHsUW...
Pikes 3 world wars: http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.ca/searc...








No comments:

Post a Comment